If you'd like to republish any of my articles, you are welcome to do so. Please add a link to the original post on my blog.

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Is Universalism So Bad for Whites?

Jews Are Waging War on Christmas and on Christianity through Hollywood

Published on The Occidental Observer

By Enza Ferreri

Our current disastrous situation is that the White race is rapidly declining in absolute numbers and the countries it built are being taken over by the Third World.

There are, clearly, two elements to this. The first is that Whites are disappearing of their own volition because they don't reproduce.

The second element is unrestricted immigration and multiculturalism.

It’s my argument that universalism in general and Christianity in particular didn't produce either (for simplicity I’m assuming that Christianity is universalist although there are exceptions). Their Leftist and Jewish distortions did.

The elephant in the room which nobody is too happy to mention is that the evident reason for the demographic suicide of White, Western peoples is that they have dissociated sex from reproduction, which Christianity teaches not to do. Here, far from Christianity being the cause of this White birth decrease, there is its opposite, the erosion and abandonment of Christianity, at the root of this trend.

There is a Jamie Kelso video in which he confronts young Whites about such an issue as well.

Whites have done this to themselves (I’m childless, so I’m not blaming others, just stating a fact). There is no amount of mass immigration, no number of people from alien races and foreign cultures that could have imposed sexual promiscuity, widespread use of contraception, abortion en masse and similar conducts on our populations.

There is, yes, an alien group with strong anti-Christian sentiments, the Jews, that has propagated the ideas behind these behaviours in the West – only for non-Jews though.

After Jesus, Judaism has taken, with the Talmud, a completely different path from its previous history and has become virulently anti-Christian - hence the deceitful ambiguity of the expressions "Judaeo-Christianity" and "Judaeo-Christian".

For major Jewish movements and organisations in the Diaspora, the weakening and erosion of
Christianity in Western societies has been a primary goal.

Christianity is what has made the West strong and united for a long time, and which Jews saw as a threat.

But it’s up to Whites not to fall into this trap.

Having fun (sex without children or "strings attached") and ambition to make money and get influence (pursuing a career) have become more important than family. This is the Christian priority of values turned upside down.

We can forever speculate about why Whites - women in particular - decided to stop having children or greatly reduced their number, but how they did it is beyond dispute.

We have all the possible empirical evidence in the world to assert that wide use of contraceptives and abortion, starting from the mid-60s, the time when Jewish influence on the minds of the young reached its full maturity, resulted in declining Western birthrates and populations.

Patrick Buchanan, in his book The Death of the West (Amazon USA) (Amazon UK) , is justifiably gloomy:
Only the mass reconversion of Western women to an idea that they seem to have given up – that the good life lies in bearing and raising children and sending them out into the world to continue the family and nation – can prevent the Death of the West.

Why are Western women having fewer children than their mothers or none at all? Why have so many enlisted in what Mother Theresa called “the war against the child”? Western women have long had access to the methods and means of birth control but chose not to use them to the extent they do today…

From studying the birth charts, we find that something happened in the mid-1960s, in the midst of the postwar prosperity, that changed the hearts and minds of Western women and killed in them the desire to live as their mothers had.
There is no usefulness coming from always blaming someone else. We have to accept our responsibilities and change our views and behaviour.

We have been brainwashed, yes. A commenter on a website once wrote: “Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish.” Virtually every mainstream media outlet is “nothing more than a screen to present chosen views.” The great battle over the last century has been a fight for the mind of the Western peoples, which the chosen won by acquiring control over practically the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media and using that control to disseminate their message and the way they want us to think.

So the first thing is to fight the battle inside ourselves. We've got to stop thinking in a way that is still affected by Leftist (read "Jewish") influences, ways of thinking which we may have absorbed in our university years.

In the same way as the words "Nazi" or "Hitler" evoke in most people a classical, Pavlovian conditioned response of refusal of everything associated with them, developed through decades of careful conditioning, so that the conscious part of the brain is totally bypassed and - without the possibility of considering the merits of it - an automatic reaction, not dissimilar from a kneejerk, is established, so words like "God", "Christian doctrine" and "Catholic teaching" evoke conditioned negative responses, inculcated by the same sources, and similarly without the benefit of knowing or reflecting on what is being rejected.

We may have become thoroughly aware of the Jewish control of the education system and media and entertainment industries, but are we just as thoroughly capable of neutralising and rejecting their effects on the less conscious parts of our brains?

How many of us have refused Christianity only on the basis of the scantest, most superficial knowledge, mostly coming from the distortions of the mainstream media in Christian-hating Jewish hands?

Universalism and Christianity don't require suicide: this is a wrong, deformed view of their meaning.
The idea that someone should suffer or die so that others can prosper has a long history.

First the animal and human sacrifices of some ancient - and contemporary - religions, including paganism.

Then animal experimentation which, although clothed in pseudoscientific garb, is a revisitation of the ritual animal sacrifices of primitive religions.

While the latter were immoral and just useless, animal experiments are worse: they are dangerous and harmful to the human beings whose health they are supposed to protect, due to the extreme unreliability of their outcome, on which treatments for humans are based.

But then scientific activity is much more dogmatic than people think, and wrong but well-established theories are hard to die.

The most recent incarnation of the belief in sacrifice is the problem we're dealing with: the indigenous people of the West are supposed to sacrifice themselves, by allowing their countries to be flooded with populations from another day and age in the distant past (that's what the Third World is), which will set the clock back for Westerners as well, in order to help these destitute, primitive populations.

Like the other forms of sacrifice described above, it will not help the supposed beneficiaries.

For the result of this invasion of epic proportions will be the eventual destruction of Western civilisation.

Whites are declining fast and furiously in number; Arabs, Blacks and Browns are replacing them in White countries due to the rates of both their migration and their reproduction. What will happen is that, like during the barbaric invasions of Rome, the more primitive human elements will prevail on the more developed and replace them.

It's easier for a more advanced state to revert to a previous one than the other way around. It will be difficult for Third Worlders to absorb and adapt to a far more sophisticated society. But it will be relatively simple for them to destroy it from within, and that will become even more effortless as their numbers and percentage of the population increase.

There is a certain entropy in human affairs as well as in nature: disorder is easier than order, destruction is easier than construction, barbarism is easier than civilisation.

If we look long-term (rather than short), we see that in the end the West, the civilisation created by Whites, will be no more. All the world will be Third World, assuming that the same process will be repeated in every part of the West.

So there will be no place where "desperate", as the media describe them, people from poor parts of the globe can go to.

The image of a lifeboat that can only take a certain number of victims of a shipwreck, sinking when that number is exceeded so that everybody on it drowns and not even the original number can survive, springs to mind.

Is this a rational strategy to pursue?

Of course not. It's not callousness, selfishness or particularism which make us realise that the West cannot take this unsustainable level of immigration and survive.

It's realism and rationality.

From an ethical, universalist viewpoint, it's essential, nay imperative, to preserve Western civilisation, which has established important moral principles to apply to humans and all other sentient beings. Without it, the world would - will? - be a much worse place.

Therefore, there is no contradiction between opposing mass immigration from the Third World and embracing universalism, no conflict between advocating a stop to this colonisation and believing in Christianity.

People quote Pope Francis and other representatives of the Church who say the opposite.

But we mustn't forget that this is the post-Vatican-II Church, which apologised to the Jews and totally changed its views on them.

This is the same Church that declared that the British Bishop Richard Williamson, “in order to claim admission to episcopal functions in the church, must distance himself in absolutely unequivocal and public fashion from his positions regarding the Shoah”. The Bishop had made remarks considered as “Holocaust denial” and refused to retract them.

Why should the Vatican impose specific views on a bishop concerning the Holocaust? How can a certain interpretation of a historical period which is not even connected with Christianity and has - one way or another - no bearing on it be regarded as such a fundamental article of faith as to justify ecclesiastical disciplinary measures?

This in itself shows that something else is at work here. The Church has for a long time been infiltrated by crypto-Jews.

But it has not always been like this. In fact, it has been only in the last few decades of its two millennia of history. We have to understand what happened to the Church, not just with Vatican II, but during decades and centuries before. TOO has explored this several times.

Those who see an affinity between Christianity and Judaism should consider that the Jews before and after Christ are not the same kind of people. Jews either sincerely converted to Christianity – in which case, by definition, they had to abandon their ethnocentrism - or became the worst enemies of Christ: they even killed him and continued their hatred through Talmudic Judaism.

To reject Christianity on the basis, as I have read sometimes, that it’s “not White”, it’s “Levantine” or of Jewish derivation is every bit as rational as if the Japanese, in an outburst of self-harming hypernationalism or racialism, had historically rejected Western technology because it hadn’t been created by Japanese or Orientals but Whites.

Finally, one has to ask oneself why, if Christianity were so bad for Whites as some people think, Jewish media, entertainment industry and intellectuals are constantly bashing and deriding it. Is it atheism or Christianity that anti-White Jews fear?

They don't attack and ridicule paganism or atheism. They actually promote and lionise atheism day in and day out. We don’t have Hollywood films making fun of atheism or criticising it.

In this regard, it’s rather uncanny how the chosen people are now imitating “Whitespeak”.

This is a comment someone left to one of my posts on Facebook:
Christianity is a Roman reworking of some sand demon kult…

They [Christians] have no place being here in the heartlands of the Celto-Germanics/Nordics. The west died when Rome/Catholics tried to destroy our real heritage.
It could sound like a fairly common – if not typical - observation from a White advocate. Except that there are several telltale signs that he’s in fact Jewish.


  1. Thanks Enza! Another fantastic article. I agree with everything you wrote here!

  2. Asteroid to hit earth - Jews to blame. Much of the world has low fertility rates - the average number of babies per women. I live in devoutly Catholic Croatia where its 1.4 the same as Japan.Its going down fast in India which will soon have European average . It would to in Iran but for its evil government.
    The problem is Africa which at the moment until the Chinese takeover is run by Africans .It has a huge population surge without any expanding economy . Too many want to migrate to Europe as the late ruler of Libya said if it becomes full of Africans it will collapse. See figures and articles on this on the boat people arriving in Italy may be the start of Camp of the Saints playing out in real life.

    1. Yes, because the Jews have nothing to do with it, do they.

  3. First, I enjoy reading your blog. Secondly, the reason all this is happening is because Whites do not engage in real life activism to promote what is best for them. The Jewish gangsters know this and use the phenomena to their advantage.

    First we need to rid ourselves of so called "White Nationalism" who do nothing but bash other Whites, Christians and show up at White gatherings to preach their endless impotence. There are no viable White organizations in America which is far less then in Europe. White Nationalists have no interest whatsoever is being pro-White.

    The proof is their lack of success in getting Whites to bond in real life. As of Jamie Kelso, a White Nationalist 'leader' bans pro-White people from his site as a "troll" for asking why White Nationalists 'leaders' do nothing but collect donations and frown upon any critique of their failure to inspire Whites to bond in real life. They cannot have a normal gathering of real life help and support as other ethnic groups. Only drunken yearly meetings, pushing their agenda on Ron Paul or Immigration rallies or a meet up to garnish donations.

    The White race, if it goes extinct will be largely due to the circus freak show called White Nationalism of which no normal White person would join even if their was something to actually join. Bizarre internet fantasy world of a "White Homeland", calling Muslims "allies" and obsessive compulsive WWII black angular like flags with no American Flag. They cannot see that in Europe success can be had with a Nation's Nationalism. But they hate America along with everything else. They ARE the Jews greatest weapon against us.

  4. Universalism also made the West great. Much less of the nasty blood feuds à la Hatfields versus McCoys compared to the rest of humanity. Contract law took the place of strategic marriage, etc. Division of labour, and consequently wealth, was boosted enormously by this relatively higher trust environment. Of course it also engendered a high faith in our institutions, more able to be penetrated by Jews (with a lot of help by their non-Jew lackeys).

  5. According to the Holy Quran, all children are born Muslims, it is their parents who make them Jew, Christian or others. This is one of the many reasons why now western peoples are reverting to Islam on their own free will. Through out the history, Muslims never forced non-Muslims to accept Islam. This is the main reason why Muslims lost Spain and India.

    The beauty of Islam is that it is a religion which appeals to common sense. There is no blind belief or dogmatism in Islam. The fundamentals of Islam are simple, straightforward and easy to understand.

    If Islam is so bad, then why is it the WORLD’S FASTEST GROWING RELIGION! It is also one of the youngest religions. However no matter how hard everyone tries to give Islam a bad name, it will be twice as more populated. So let’s get straight to the point yeah?, Basically Islam is the most hated religion I don’t know why hmm maybe because it is also the most fastest growing religion and 2nd largest but no one will be able to stop this religion from growing.

    Islam is the fastest growing faith in Britain. Hundreds and thousands of Brits are reverting to Islam. By the middle of this century, over half of Brits would be Muslims.

    “I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of
    its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to
    possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which
    can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him – the wonderful man
    and in my opinion for from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the
    saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the
    dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems
    in a way that would bring it the much
    needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad
    that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to
    be acceptable to the Europe of today.” [G.B. Shaw, THE GENUINE ISLAM,
    Vol. No. 81936.]

    1. The future of human race is in Islam. You will either be a Muslim or a non-Muslim. There is no third way.

      Islam is just a religion and offers a complete code of law and guidance in all those aspects of life that, directly or indirectly, belong to moral and spiritual progress of humankind. It basically concerns to moral and spiritual conditions of its followers, therefore always prefers to improve their behaviour and actions in different spheres of life. Islam is the most practical religion, and the one most calculated to solve the world’s many perplexing problems, and to bring to humanity peace and happiness.”

      Islam does not suggests a particular political system to follow but shows, in the Quran, a flexible attitude towards different political systems of rule like tribalism, feudalism, liberal democracy or monarchy etc. and offers a freedom to its followers to select any political system that is suitable and acceptable to their circumstances and traditions.

      However, the fundamental principles of ruling, suggested by the Qur’an, are very close to the basic rules of democratic system. A sign of true believers of Islam is mentioned : ''whose affairs are settled by mutual consultation.'' (Quran 42:38) This practice to make decision in the matter of government through mutual consultation reminds us the first part of the definition of democracy: ''government of the people''.

      The second part in the definition of democracy is ''a government that is by the people.'' and Quran says about it: ''Allah commands you to make over the trusts to those who best fitted to discharge them''.(Quran 4:59) This verse of the Quran not only promotes the notion that the members of a government should be selected by people but also advises something more about their selection and that is to select the best one among the people who have real ability to fulfil the responsibility.

      The companions of the Prophet of Islam (sa) always tried to excel each other in doing good and asked the Prophet (sa) how they could increase their deeds and become more righteous. In one of these inquiries, the Prophet of Islam(sa), as if to summarize the situation, informed them that the best among them is actually the one who is best to his family. This is a very profound position not only in seventh century Arabia where wives were no more than chattels, but even today when they appear to be the least of men’s worries. By making the state of wives the very measure of the quality of men, Islam, more than any other religion or ideology, has placed women in a pedestal, which guarantees their happiness and welfare. If wives of Muslim men are not the happiest of wives, it is not because of Islam, it is in spite of it.

      This special position of the mother had been preceded by verses of the Quran: 'And We have enjoined on man to be good to his parents - his mother bears him in weakness upon weakness, and his weaning takes two years - and said, 'Give thanks to Me and thy parents. Unto Me is the final return.” (Quran 31:15) It is not difficult, therefore, to understand why the Prophet of Islam (sa) said, "Paradise lies at the feet of

      Extremist, like fundamentalist, is only a derisory term if the ideology in question is detrimental to humanity. The problem with Islamic fundamentalism are the fundamentals of Islam. Mothers” (Muslim) So, as a daughter, as a wife and as a mother, Islam has given a woman such a special and distinguished position that no other culture or civilization has given her.

      I'm an extremist - The Tory Party are extremists - The Labour Party are extremists...... Representative Democracy is voting for extremists in positions of concentrated power (that tends to make people EXTREMELY CORRUPT...... Real Direct Democracy (although considered extremists) is slap bang in the middle of the political spectrum, if you think about it rationally..... All Top-Down control systems are POTENTIALLY extremist - Bottom-up direct democracy should create BALANCE.

  6. It's white genocide.

    Driven by the you-know-whos.