why isn't the black policeman who killed Ashli Babbitt at the Capitol Hill prosecuted? They’ve given a lengthy sentence to Derek Chauvin while the poor George Floyd with good probability died of an overdose.
Could it be by any chance because the unarmed woman victim, Ashli Babbitt
Exclusive: Police Lieutenant Who Killed January 6 Capitol Rioter Ashli Babbitt Finally Identified
BY HAMIL HARRIS AND DAVID MARTOSKO, ZENGER NEWS
It snd the message that the murder of a white person is not as serious as the killing of a black.
https://news.wttw.com/2021/04/10/heart-disease-fentanyl-contributed-george-floyd-s-death-were-not-main-cause-medical
https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-police-lieutenant-who-killed-january-6-capitol-rioter-ashli-babbitt-finally-identified-1623166
https://www.deseret.com/2021/8/11/22567499/who-shot-ashli-babbitt-trump-january-6-can-journalists-protest-john-sullivan-us-capitol-riot
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/14/liberal-activist-charged-capitol-riot-459553
https://theintercept.com/2021/01/14/capitol-riot-john-sullivan-ashli-babbitt/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/
https://www.unz.com/aanglin/ashli-babbitts-executioner-was-black/
https://www.google.com/search?q=unz.org+why+isn%27t+the+black+policeman+who+killed+Ashli+Babbitt+prosecuted%3F&sxsrf=AOaemvK0rWq12ZzlPtcmOksXfswxHUgktw%3A1632169097238&ei=iexIYZ72Df6D9u8P2eqVuAU&oq=unz.org+why+isn%27t+the+black+policeman+who+killed+Ashli+Babbitt+prosecuted%3F&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BwgAEEcQsANKBAhBGABQ1ogCWL_KA2DvzgNoAnACeACAAUeIAeYBkgEBNJgBAKABAaABAsgBCMABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwje3oPar47zAhX-gf0HHVl1BVcQ4dUDCA4&uact=5
https://www.unz.com/aanglin/ashli-babbitts-executioner-was-black/
another thing I don't understand is why "white" should be with a small-letter initial and "black" with a capital-letter intitial. Wasn't the idea that of becoming/being color-blind? How can you achieve that with this kind of behaviour and slogans like BLM?
https://www.takimag.com/article/racial-revenge/ - similar discrepancy
https://www.takimag.com/article/the-lynching-of-a-black-jogger/
https://www.takimag.com/article/the_emmett_till_effect_steve_sailer/
The usual idea of science is based on a series of anecdotes.
This has produced many misunderstandings about the real nature of science, which includes misunderstandings by scientists themselves.
As the philosopher of science Thomas S. Kuhn has shown in his major and path-breaking work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, the concept of science is usually seen as observations, laws and theories.
This is an anti-historic approach.
Science is not an accumulation of data. Science derives from a new way of looking at the same or similar phenomena.
Different theories are part of a historic process in which a specific paradigm, or dominant view, is replaced by another, hence the expression "scientic revolutions".
Scientific progress derives from this competition among competing theories. Accumulation of data per se is not as important as the way the data are explained in a complex theory.
When we say "revolutions" this indicates that the same natural phenomenon or observation will be entirely differently explained as part of diverse theories.
Astronomers and physicists could see the same celestial bodies but attach to them different behaviour and laws of movement.
One of the greatest scientific revolutions was the abandoning of the theory that the sun rotates around the earth, aka the geocentric theory, for the heliocentric theory, that is the complete opposite: it is the earth to rotate around the sun.
Here we have the great Polish man of the cloth and astronomer Nicholas Copernicus who revolutioned the geocentric view.
New knowledge in science doesn't derive from change in observations or data but in the way these are part of different theories.
After Copernicus there was another great mind, Galileo Galilei, scientist born in Pisa, Italy.
He paved the way to the law of universal gravitation by the English Isaac Newton.
Another major example of scientific revolution is in biology, where Charles Darwin adopted the theory of evolution through natural selection among animal species and opposed Lamark's
theory of inheritance of acquired characters, which are developed by the animal's environment.
These cannot be transmitted genetically because they don't form part of animal DNA, which is the only part of of the parents that is inherited by their offspring.
The Australian philosopher Peter Singer is the author of the book Animal Liberation, which I translated into Italian with the title Liberazione Animale and was published by Mondadori, one of the major publishing companies in Italy. The book, in both languages, has given rise to an international movement.
Singer goes to the crux of fundamental central ethical questions.
The central moral question, when we talk about humans using animals for medico-scientific experiments or in machinised farming conditions and slaughter for human food, is not "can non-human animals think or can they talk?" but "can they suffer?"
The answer is obviously yes.
Human beings will also benefit from the end of medical-pharmaceutical experiments on animals, due to the species differences which lead the experimenters to apply to humans results obtained from other species who have different anatomy and physiology from us and as a consequence it is extremely risky to deduce that some practice or substance innocuous for other animals will have the same effect on humans.
As I have explained in my post published here just before this one, the consequences can be and often are disastrous for humans, as many famous cases, like that of the drug Thalidomide and numerous others, have demonstrated.
Ethics and science on this subject lead to the same conclusion.
Experiments on animals in medical research to apply the experiments' results to human beings does not just harm the animals who suffer terribly (not for nothing this practice is called "vivisection"), but are also dangerous for humans, because it is well known that different animal species (of which we are one) have different reactions to the same substances, medical procedures and all that these experiments entail, and therefore applying the results of animal experiments to humans is an unreliable practice and causes severe problems to human subjects.
As the great author Hans Ruesch wrote in his book "Naked Empress, present medical science is accused", "When the drug compamy has demonstrated that a new drug is innocuous to animals, the drug company obtains the authorisation to sell it for human use, after very few clinical trials".
There is a long list of pharmaceutical and medical disasters to testify that.
One of these disasters was the case of the Talidomide, a tranquilliser invented by the German company Chemie Grunenthal, which after three years of animal experiments on thousands of animals was thought to be so innocuous that its sale even without a medical prescription had been approved in all of West Germany: this was reported by Time magazine on 23-2-1962.
This tranqu physiologist, surgeonilliser was not just was one of the many pharmaceutic drugs sold under different labels, but a genuinely new product, and therefore the preventative tests on animals - as the lawsuit which followed demonstrated - had been particularly conscientious and widespread.
It is interesting that scientists themselves, among whom the celebrated physiologist, surgeon and doctor Sie Charles Bell, have remarked that this research method is anti-scientific exactly because it is inhumane: because it is practised by insensitive or hardened people, in whom the most equisite human qaulities have been destroyed or never existed, sensitivity being a component, and a minimal one, of human intelligence.
The thalidomide pharmaceutical drug, which caused 10,000 deformed babies as well as causing irreversible peripheral neuropathy in innumerable adults, is a totally innocuous substance for nearly all animal species, whereas the innocuous Aspirin, which mankind has consummed in enormous quantities for more than a century, causes deformed births in rats. Manufacturers of Entero-Vioformio, largely used by men, recommend not to give it to pets and farm animals, for whom it can be deadly.
City Pass Best Deals
The best offers for those who wish to visit Venice.
In complete freedom and autonomy.
Buy your City Pass
Public Trasport in Venice
Public transport to get around Venice, the islands and the mainland (Vaporetti / Bus / Tram / People Mover)
Buy online
Museums and Theatres in Venice
Buy tickets easily for the city's most important museums. These include the Doge's Palace, Ca' Rezzonico and the Peggy Guggenheim Collection. A guided tour of the Gran Teatro La Fenice is an absolute must..
Buy online
Other Monuments and Historical Buildings
Immerse yourself in the rich history and culture of the city by visiting iconic monuments like the Scala del Bovolo, the Venice Ghetto, and the Scuole Grandi.
Buy online
Airport Transfers "Marco Polo" and "Canova"
Connection Venice - Marco Polo Airport and Venice - Canova (Treviso) Airport
Buy online
Parking and Services
Buy tickets online for parking in Piazzale Roma (Autorimessa Comunale) or for using the city's public toilets (WC Veritas).
Buy online
Venezia Unica City Pass - How it works
how_to.pngThis is a brief guide to help you use the Venezia Unica shopping section and redeem your voucher, allowing you to benefit from the products you have purchased.
Instructions
Venezia Unica City Pass - Find your voucher
how_to.pngA brief guide to help you recover your Venezia Unica voucher and the services included.
Instructions
The Viareggio Carnival 2026 took place from February 1 to February 21, with spectacular events and parades of allegorical floats.
Dates and Program
Start of the Carnival: The Viareggio Carnival 2026 began with the opening Masked Course on February 1 at 15:00, followed by by a fireworks display that marked the official start of the festival.
2
Masquerade Courses: During the Carnival, there were several masquerade courses, including evening events that start at 5:00 pm. Shrove Thursday, one of the most anticipated days, had its masked course at 17:00, creating a magical atmosphere with the lights of the floats.
2
Closing of the Carnival: The Carnival ended with the closing Masked Course on February 21st.
1
3 Sources
Activities and Attractions
The Viareggio Carnival is famous for its gigantic floats, music, fireworks displays and the festive atmosphere that involves the whole city. Every year, the carnival attracts thousands of visitors, offering a unique experience of fun and culture.
www.laversilia.it
+1
Tickets
Tickets for masked courses can be purchased online and vary according to the type and date. It is advisable to book in advance, as demand is high during the Carnival period .
www.laversilia.it
+1
For more details and updates, you can visit the official website of the Viareggio Carnival.Don't miss the opportunity to participate in this extraordinary event!
The so-called "memory wars" were a prolonged conflict of views throughout the 1990s between psychotherapists and scientific psychologists about whether childhood memories of sexual abuse could be totally forgotten ("repressed", in line with psychoanalytic theory) and then "retrieved" in adult age through psychotherapy and drugs.
The former group, who coined the concepts of both repressed and recovered memories and many of whom derived their livelihood from them, generally believed that the answer is yes, while the latter group, headed by international memory expert Elizabeth Loftus, said that their own experiments disproved them and replied no.
It's been pointed out, by comedienne Roseanne Barr who claimed to have recovered memories of being abused as a child during therapy after something similar had happened to her husband, fellow comedian Tom Arnold, that memories of war can be blocked. So, she rhetorically asks, why not sexual abuse memories?
I'll start by attempting to answer that question. Perhaps war memories are wiped out because their trauma is of a different nature: it involves the fear of dying.
I had a quite serious car accident once, which I've forgotten from the moment I was in the car's passenger seat and felt the impact of another car to when I was in the hospital.
I'm just hypothesizing, but it could be that the fear for one's life has a traumatic power unmatched by that of sexual abuse.
I find it extremely schizophrenic of our "sexually liberated" society that, while we generally consider sexual activity to have no or little moral relevance - certainly much less than our great-great-grandparents attributed to it -, at the same time we ascribe to sex and sexual experiences an immense psychological power, to the point of potentially totally destroying our mental health.
Rape and sexual abuse of adults and children are viewed as the most heinous crimes (as Law and Order puts it), worse than comparably bad physical attacks and even - absurdly - worse than murder.
Is this - the exaggeration of the psychological importance of sex - the way we compensate the underestimation of the ethical importance of sex?
The enormous power attributed to sex in mental health originally derives from a false theory, Freud's psychoanalysis.
Freud himself considered it as a scientific theory.
One of the greatest philosophers of science of our time, Sir Karl Popper, disagreed. According to his criterion of demarcation between science and metaphysics (non-science), a theory is scientific only when it can be empirically refuted - by observation or experiment.
Popper believed that psychoanalysis is compatible with every possible observation: if the patient agrees with the psychoanalyst's interpretation, he proves it to be right. If the patient disagrees, it's only due to his resistances, which proves that the interpretation found some repressed area in his subconscious and therefore is right.
Despite the fact that this often happens in psychoanalysis and that supporters of the theory act in the dogmatic way which Popper ascribes to them, defending it against any contrary evidence, I think that psychoanalysis is scientific in the Popperian sense because it can be proven false.
In fact it has been proven false.
Its laboratory is the psychoanalyst's couch itself. The psychoanalytic therapy should, according to the theory, help to restore mental health.
It has been amply shown that in the overwhelming majority of cases it doesn't. Often it leads to more lifelong misery and even suicide.
Ergo, the theory is false.
Patients have voted with their feet, and psychoanalysis has in the last few decades lost much of its credibility not just among its potential clients but among the public in general. Cinema and literature, in addition, once drew from psychoanalysis far more of their inspiration than they do now.
Even more, psychology scholars have increasingly abandoned their attraction to Sigmund Freud's ideas.
The progress of scientific psychology has helped disproving psychoanalysis, showing that the mind doesn't work in the way Freud believed.
The study of memory is a perfect case in point.
The dichotomy between "therapists" and scientific psychologists about the repressed and recovered memory versus false memories is exactly this. The former still think in Freudian terms, the latter don't.